United States President Donald Trump approved the release of a contentious secret memorandum on Friday that alleges evidence provided by former MI6 agent Christopher Steele was used as reason for a wiretap of a Trump campaign aide.
The released memo alleges that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no surveillance warrant would have been requested for campaign staffer Carter Page without the controversial Steele dossier.
The FISA court granted a warrant to monitor Page and approved three subsequent renewals, according to the document
Even if the Steele dossier was used as part of the application, a FISA renewal suggests that a judge was convinced that the surveillance of Page was yielding information about his acting as an agent of a foreign power that was criteria for continued monitoring.
Some of the dossier’s information has been corroborated by the FBI, but it is not known exactly what intelligence has been gleaned from it.
The dossier was funded by the Democratic Party as opposition research and later by Fusion GPS before being handed over to the U.S. and United Kingdom intelligence communities.
The Trump-Russia dossier was written by ex-British intelligence agent Christopher Steele and used to secure the surveillance warrant on Page without identifying that the dossier was funded in part by Democratic sources.
Trump earlier accused the Federal Bureau of Investigation of bias while carrying out its ongoing probe into allegations of collusion between the 2016 Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government, accusations both Mr. Trump and Moscow deny.
The memo was commissioned by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. David Nunes and written by Republican staffers from the same party.
Following Trump’s approval, Congress released the document for public viewing.
Earlier on Friday the president attacked top officials at the FBI and the Department of Justice on Twitter, accusing them of politicizing their probes to damage his Republican Party.
While Republicans supported the memo’s release as a defense for the administration, Democrats said it aimed to undermine investigations into Trump and his associates, including Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe.
The White House made no changes to the memo, spokesman Raj Shah said, and declassified the document “in full”, with Trump repeating his accusations of bias to reporters as he signed off on the document.
“I think it”s a disgrace,” the president said, explaining that people should be “ashamed”.
Read memo in full
Below is the released memorandum in full:
January 18, 2018
To: HPSCI Majority Members
From: HPSCI Majority Staff
Subject: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses at the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
This memorandum provides Members an update on significant facts relating to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and their use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) during the 2016 presidential election cycle. Our findings, which are detailed below, 1) raise concerns with the legitimacy and legality of certain DOJ and FBI interactions with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC), and 2) represent a troubling breakdown of legal processes established to protect the American people from abuses related to the FISA process.
On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order (not under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a U.S. citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate-confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division.
The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. §,1805(d)(l)), a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Then-DAG Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.
Due to the sensitive nature of foreign intelligence activity, FISA submissions (including renewals) before the FISC are classified. As such, the public’s confidence in the integrity of the FISA process depends on the court’s ability to hold the government to the highest standard—particularly as it relates to surveillance of American citizens. However, the FISC’s rigor in protecting the rights of Americans, which is reinforced by 90-day renewals of surveillance orders, is necessarily dependent on the government’s production to the court of all material and relevant facts. This should include information potentially favorable to the target of the FISA application that is known by the government. In the case of Carter Page, the government had at least four independent opportunities before the FISC to accurately provide an accounting of the relevant facts. However, our findings indicate that, as described below, material and relevant information was omitted.
1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.
a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.
b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by—the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.
2) The Carter Page FISA application also cited extensively a September 23, 2016, Yahoo News article by Michael Isikoff, which focuses on Page’s July 2016 trip to Moscow. This article does not corroborate the Steele dossier because it is derived from information leaked by Steele himself to Yahoo News. The Page FISA application incorrectly assesses that Steele did not directly provide information to Yahoo News. Steele has admitted in British court filings that he met with Yahoo News—and several other outlets—in September 2016 at the direction of Fusion GPS. Perkins Coie was aware of Steele’s initial media contacts because they hosted at least one meeting in Washington D.C. in 2016 with Steele and Fusion GPS where this matter was discussed.
a) Steele was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations—an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI in an October 30, 2016, Mother Jones article by David Corn. Steele should have been terminated for his previous undisclosed contacts with Yahoo and other outlets in September—before the Page application was submitted to the FISC in October—but Steele improperly concealed from and lied to the FBI about those contacts.
b) Steele’s numerous encounters with the media violated the cardinal rule of source handling—maintaining confidentiality—and demonstrated that Steele had become a less than reliable source for the FBI.
3) Before and after Steele was terminated as a source, he maintained contact with DOJ via then-Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr, a senior DOJ official who worked closely with Deputy Attorneys General Yates and later Rosenstein. Shortly after the election, the FBI began interviewing Ohr, documenting his communications with Steele. For example, in September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.” This clear evidence of Steele’s bias was recorded by Ohr at the time and subsequently in official FBI files—but not reflected in any of the Page FISA applications.
a) During this same time period, Ohr’s wife was employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump. Ohr later provided the FBI with all of his wife’s opposition research, paid for by the DNC and Clinton campaign via Fusion GPS. The Ohrs’ relationship with Steele and Fusion GPS was inexplicably concealed from the FISC.
4) According to the head of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, Assistant Director Bill Priestap, corroboration of the Steele dossier was in its “infancy” at the time of the initial Page FISA application. After Steele was terminated, a source validation report conducted by an independent unit within FBI assessed Steele’s reporting as only minimally corroborated. Yet, in early January 2017, Director Comey briefed President-elect Trump on a summary of the Steele dossier, even though it was—according to his June 2017 testimony—“salacious and unverified.” While the FISA application relied on Steele’s past record of credible reporting on other unrelated matters, it ignored or concealed his anti-Trump financial and ideological motivations. Furthermore, Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.
5) The Page FISA application also mentions information regarding fellow Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos, but there is no evidence of any cooperation or conspiracy between Page and Papadopoulos. The Papadopoulos information triggered the opening of an FBI counterintelligence investigation in late July 2016 by FBI agent Pete Strzok. Strzok was reassigned by the Special Counsel’s Office to FBI Human Resources for improper text messages with his mistress, FBI Attorney Lisa Page (no known relation to Carter Page), where they both demonstrated a clear bias against Trump and in favor of Clinton, whom Strzok had also investigated. The Strzok/Lisa Page texts also reflect extensive discussions about the investigation, orchestrating leaks to the media, and include a meeting with Deputy Director McCabe to discuss an “insurance” policy against President Trump’s election.
The FBI warned against releasing the memo due to factual “omissions” that could result in negative consequences.
Bureau Director Christopher Wray and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had requested the White House not to release it for fear that it could reveal classified information and jeopardize national security.
“The FBI was provided a limited opportunity to review this memo the day before the committee voted to release it,” the FBI said in a statement before the memo was made public.
“As expressed during our initial review, we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”
More details to follow. Image of Donald Trump from the Chicago Tribune.
Trudeau breaks ethics rules, commissioner says in report
This will likely have a significant impact on the federal election.
Humber releases behind-the-scenes orientation video
Get a look at orientation visits to Humber.
Bianca Andreescu wins Rogers Cup
The 19-year-old Mississauga native is the first Canadian women to win the tournament since Faye Urban in 1969.
Subway introducing meatless meatball sub next month
It is unclear if this will include Humber College North Campus.
Ryerson student president allegedly fires executive director
An already hurt student union gets jolted again.
Campus1 month ago
First Year Experience launches blog to help students
Campus1 month ago
Humber College outlines how student fees will work
Campus1 month ago
Factcheck: ‘Your guide to everything IGNITE’
Campus1 month ago
Exclusive: Frosh not under threat due to SCI, IGNITE director says
Campus1 month ago
IGNITE touts how its ‘changed the lives of students’
Analysis4 weeks ago
IGNITE shifts to be more transparent
Campus1 month ago
How IGNITE got a new vice president
Campus1 month ago
Registration opens for orientation