Connect with us


IGNITE’s Nazim says The Avro Post is ‘not sanctioned’

Maheen Nazim called The Avro Post “not sanctioned”.



Eli Ridder | The Avro Post

IGNITE Vice President Maheen Nazim, who represents the University of Guelph-Humber, said on Sunday night that she does not reply to requests for comment from The Avro Post because it is “not sanctioned” on-campus media.

Nazim’s Comments:

Staff at The Avro Post had replied to a comment Nazim had given in response to a student, asking about accountability with student government platforms and unanswered requests for comment in emails sent to her.

“These are fair questions going unanswered, and it’s your job to answer on-campus media,” staff wrote.

“I believe you may have meant sanctioned media (which your publication does not fall under),” Nazim wrote back, saying that she responds to all official media and student inquiries within 48 hours.

The Avro Post was originally an official IGNITE club shortly after a rebranding event in March, but the student publication lost club status after the student union wanted to control what the Post published.

Staff followed up with these details and questioned what “sanctioned” on-campus media exactly meant, but Nazim has yet to respond publicly or to a private Post request via Instagram’s Direct Message function.

The Avro Post is backed by the Canadian University Press, a national student journalism organization that was founded 1938.


Students at the University of Guelph-Humber have started to respond to the comments made by their vice president. 

“It is IGNITE’s responsibility to respond to media requests, sanctioned or not,” Emelia Maceášik said, asking “what does ‘sanctioned’ mean in this context, anyways?”

Maceášik is the president of an IGNITE-sanctioned club, the Humber College branch of the Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy.

“Regardless, if students have questions, they deserve to be answered in a timely and professional manner…the opposite of what IGNITE is doing,” the Guelph-Humber student continued.


The Avro Post has compiled the comments from the Instagram post for accountability purposes.

First response by TAP
Response by VP Nazim
Second response by TAP

The Avro Post has sent several emails to IGNITE executives that have gone unanswered since August, several of them being requests for comment on topics or events.

A record of emails compiled in an investigation last month found that 14 emails have gone unanswered, with likely more since it was published on Nov. 15, and with no comment from IGNITE.

Image of Maheen Nazim from campaign.

Editor’s Note: With the use of the word staff, The Avro Post means that multiple staff members of the publication carried out the interaction. ■

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply


IGNITE Board to meet again in a hidden location

The student union has hidden exact locations since September.



File photo via Pexels.

IGNITE’s Board of Directors, made up of elected student representatives, will be meeting on Wednesday evening at the University of Guelph-Humber, according to a schedule posted earlier this year by the student union, but no exact location or time has been made public.

The Board meeting locations were removed by the student union in September after paid staff blocked a reporter from The Avro Post from entering that month’s gathering of directors, a meeting that later turned out to be of major significance.

The Avro Post attempted to find the meeting in October but was unsuccessful. According to the IGNITE bylaws, the directors have to hold a majority vote to kick a student from the meeting, including student journalists. They are also required to post the meetings publicly.

However, IGNITE has rules currently on its Governance webpage that instruct students, who are classified as members of the union, to reach out to the executive director to obtain access to the meetings, bending the rules of their own bylaws.

If the meeting is indeed held in the University of Guelph-Humber, the typical location for the Board to gather is the conference room found by the entrance doors to the university in the Atrium. ■

Continue Reading


Briefing: Everything IGNITE since September

100 words, 700 words and point-form.



Graphic by The Avro Post.


Welcome to the Briefing, a new type of article that breaks down a story into a 100 word version, a 700 full-length edition and a point form analysis.

This Briefing is on everything going on with the governance of IGNITE, the student union for Humber College and the University of Guelph-Humber, since the beginning of the student year.

100 words

IGNITE is looking to make several changes to how the student union works. 

All of these changes will need majority approval from students at a January Special Meeting of the Members. They were previously approved by the Board of Directors in September.

The proposed bylaw amendments give the Board more unilateral power and end president and vice president elections.

The Board has been hiding the location of their meetings, breaking its own bylaws that specify that exact times and locations are to be posted publicly.

IGNITE recently cut off The Avro Post from press briefings, interviews and all media requests.

700 words

IGNITE has proposed several bylaw amendments to how its governance and operations function. Some of these changes have precedent elsewhere but many are uncommon for a student union.

All of these changes will need majority approval from students at a January Special Meeting of the Members, a meeting that any student can attend and have a vote on the changes as a unified package, but not individual amendments.

These amendments were previously approved by the Board of Directors in September. The meeting minutes only give the “highlights” of the amendments so it may not be all of the proposed changes, however.

The most outwardly noticeable change for students at Humber College and the University of Guelph-Humber will be the end of executive elections.

The executive team is made up of the president, who represents all IGNITE members and each vice president, each representing either North Campus, Lakeshore or Guelph-Humber.

Another change that the Board wants to bring about is the ability for their decisions to come into effect immediately after majority approval at a meeting. However, an item approved will still need later approval at a meeting of the members.

If the members — all voting students — vote against the changes at the Special Meeting of the Members, it is unclear if the decision is applied retroactively or if the Board’s decision is simply repealed from the bylaws. 

Also, if students are unable to find the Board meetings and minutes are only posted a month later after they are approved at the next Board meeting, students would be unaware for at least 30 days that a bylaw had changed.

The Board did not post the meeting minutes from the May or September meetings until long after the October Board meeting, which, despite efforts from The Avro Post to find it, was hidden.

If The Post was able to enter the Board meeting in September instead of being told to leave in a unilateral move by a staff member, then this publication would have been able to report that these bylaws were passed by the directors.

There were some new items also passed by the Board and up for consideration by students in January including, but not limited to, new classifications of IGNITE membership, document execution being under the control of the executive director and a vaguely worded amendment specifying that “president term will be used for [B]oard chairperson”.

The new classifications come about because of the Student Choice Initiative and was expected. 

The top classification is “Full-Time Enhanced Members”, which appear to be those that opt-in to IGNITE fees, though there is no specification for those that only opt-in to some. 

“Full-Time Members” and “Part-Time Members” are those who pay only the mandatory ancillary fees. All three classifications are official members of IGNITE and so it is understood they will be able to still vote in elections and at special meetings.

It is unclear exactly what “executive documents being overseen by the executive director” means as an amendment but The Avro Post has reached out for comment from IGNITE for clarification.

Another hard-to-understand change is the “president term” being used for the Board chairperson. It is not clear via the meeting minutes whether that means the president’s term in regards to time or the terminology of “president” being applied to the chairperson.

Currently, the Board directors start and end their term at the same time as the executives so it would seem unusual for new amendments to specify that just the chair would have the same term timewise as the president.

It seems more likely that the chairperson position itself could be renamed to “president” to signify the Board’s importance from the student perspective, a goal that Executive Director Ercole Perrone and other officials have said they have committed to in the coming months.

These items will be flushed out in more detail at the Special Meeting of the Member and potentially press briefings that The Post will no longer have access to due to being cut off by IGNITE on Oct. 15 from press briefings, elected student representatives and all other media requests.

President Monica Khosla explained the main reason for this was because The Post inaccurately reported that the executive director, Perrone, said that IGNITE eventually wants to cut Board of Directors meetings off entirely from students that are members.

The Avro Post stands by the reporting as accurate. However, there is no plan in place at this time in the set of bylaw amendments headed to the special meeting in January to enact such a change.

Point analysis

Various points on the incoming bylaws:

  • Unilateral Board decisions: Also not unprecedented and appears to be utilized by other student unions. However, an ex-president of another student union said that changing bylaws are typically a move ratified by an AGM.
    • To note: Amendments will still be ratified by a meeting of the members — which are all students — with this proposal.

All these changes will be passed or not passed at a Special Meeting of the Members expected for mid- to late-January. If they are passed, they will come into effect, likely immediately.

If not, it is unclear if there will be need to be urgent Board action to come up with new proposals for the Annual General Meeting usually held near the end of the winter semester. ■

Continue Reading


IGNITE holding financial planning event

The event is part of the ‘Lunch & Learn’ series.



File photo.

IGNITE is holding a free event focused on financial planning featuring Rob Carrick of The Globe and Mail.

The event, called ‘How to Not Move Back in With Your Parents”, will run on Nov. 13 from 12:30 to 2:30 p.m. and students can register via Eventbrite.

The first 25 students to arrive will recieve a free copy of Carrick’s book of the same name as the event.

The event is part of the “Lunch & Learn” series on how to be an adult presented by IGNITE, that focuses on financial independence. ■

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.