Connect with us

Campus

Canada could play role in Sussex exit plan

New poll shows Canadians support Prince Harry becoming governor general.

Published

on

Prince Harry and Meghan could live with their son in Canada. Photo via Wikimedia Commons.

After Prince Harry and his U.S. wife Meghan — officially the Duke and Duchess of Sussex — gave a surprise announcement earlier this week that they would be stepping back from royal duties, the British monarchy aims to sort out an exit plan for the couple that could include Canada.

The royal pair shocked the queen and other Windsors on Wednesday when they released an Instagram statement saying they wanted to lead a more independent life, both financially and physically, in a move British press dubbed “Megexit”.

The Sussex’s said that they would split their time between Britain and North America to allow them and their baby son Archie the space they needed.

The prince has long expressed his anger over the treatment he and his wife have received from media tabloids. Reporters will be restricted in future engagements with the couple, their statement said.

Many reports stated that Queen Elizabeth and other royals were “hurt” by the move, which was made without consultation.

Canadian taxpayers could have to supply millions of dollars a year in security expenses if the royal pair move even part time to the country, security experts told Reuters news agency.

However, according to a poll conducted by Postmedia, 60 per cent of Canadians are in favour of Prince Harry taking on the role of governor general, the Queen’s top representative in Canada.

The royal couple have strong ties to Canada. Meghan Markle spent years filming for the show Suits in Toronto and Prince Harry has been a part of several events, including opening the
Toronto Invictus Games in 2017.

The pair most recently spent a significant chunk of their Christmas break in Vancouver.

But is it possible? Since the Queen appoints the governor general on the advice of the prime minister, it would technically be entirely doable for Prince Harry to take up the role.

But the reported rift that has opened between the Sussex royals and the rest of the family in Britain could make it difficult for the prince to get the nod from the Crown, should he want it.

There’s also the matter of that Canada already has Gov. Gen. Julia Payette, though she has suffered her own scandals since her appointment by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in 2017.

For now, Meghan has returned to Canada to take care of her son Archie. Royal family fans will no doubt stay alert for any updates from the Sussex couple and Birmingham Palace on what the future holds. ■

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Campus

A new era for IGNITE

The next generation of directors will have new challenges.

Published

on

File photo of the IGNITE symbol.

With the passing of several bylaw amendments on Wednesday at a Special Meeting of the Members, IGNITE on Thursday strides into a new era with five months of decision-making behind it.

Elections will start in a matter of weeks and, for the first time in its history, the student union will not be electing executives. There will only be candidates for the Board, which sits at the top of IGNITE. 

There will be open seats at Humber College’s North, Lakeshore and Orangeville Campuses as well as at the University of Guelph-Humber. This next generation of directors will preside over a very different student union then the one the current term was handed last April.

In some ways, there will be more certainty.

They will enter a student union that has been reset with a new, more corporate direction moving forward through a new base rule: By-law No. 1 — which resets the rules for IGNITE with the bylaw amendments that students passed at the Special Meeting of the Members, combined with the skeleton of the previous Constitution.

That is not to say there will not be challenges. Chief among them will be the ongoing legal struggle over the Student Choice Initiative. Currently, the province is looking to appeal the decision made by the Ontario Divisional Court to strike down the initiative.

Several student unions, including the University of Toronto Students’ Union, have closed off the optional fees, ending its optional student fees and returning to the previous status quo of 100 per cent mandatory fees.

IGNITE reiterated its position on Wednesday that it would not end optional student fees while the SCI was in essential legal limbo.

If the Ford administration is successful in repealing the court ruling, student union officials said they would not want a scenario where they would have to flip-flop between mandatory and optional fees.

Directors will also have to manage hiring and overseeing the new student engagement coordinators, who will replace the current executive model.

They will be hired staffers within the student union and sit below the executive director and alongside part-time staff, according to graphics released by IGNITE. ■

Continue Reading

Campus

Constitution formally replaced with ‘By-law No. 1’

It awaits AGM approval.

Published

on

File photo.

Following approval by the members of new bylaw amendments on Wednesday, IGNITE has replaced its Constitution with “By-law No. 1”, though it still needs confirmation by the members at the Annual General Meeting.

By-Law No. 1 contains eight pages of rules, a full five pages less than the previous Constitution. It states it will need confirmation by the members on Mar. 22, 2020, a potential reveal of the date set for the AGM, a normal timeframe. ■

Continue Reading

Campus

Jack Fisher: ‘I know IGNITE can do better’

An opinion column from Jack Fisher.

Published

on

By

File photo.

OPINION

Jack Fisher
Contributor
The Avro Post
Our Opinion Policy.

I know well the stress that comes from hosting a public meeting as a student leader.

As the organizer of an event like the meeting IGNITE hosted on Wednesday, you know everything that’s going on, and your ideas and your stance seem so incredibly obvious to you.

However, just like so many other places, there are a lot of people that don’t know how to ask the right questions. Just like every comment section on the internet, you can scroll through all the good comments and praise, but the one thing that sticks with you is the negative and uninformed comments.

This stress and frustration tend to build up until there’s a whole flutter of butterflies in your stomach. Even if you’ve spent weeks planning something, its possible that your advertising doesn’t get out on time. You overthink whether you’ll achieve quorum, and you brace yourself for a barrage of uninformed questions and criticism that you imagine will turn into a personal attack as soon as your event is over.

This isn’t to say that I know this is how anyone on IGNITE was feeling on Wednesday morning, but I can imagine the tension that was behind the table on stage today at Humber College’s North Campus. I know the board has probably deliberated all the details for hours.

You could tell from the responses of the board members and chair that they had practiced their reasoning. They’ve been thinking about this for weeks, if not months. You could tell, because what the crowd got as answers was internalized jargon. We heard citations of the Ontario Not-for-profit Corporations Act, and confident assertions that the decisions were made in consultation with legal professionals.

All of this is to say that, from a student executive position, the Special Meeting of the Members went incredibly well. There was only about 15 minutes of questioning, everything passed as planned, and the meeting itself was exactly 30 minutes long with maybe 70 people in attendance — more than was required for quorum.

Unfortunately, knowing how I felt as an executive, also tells me that there is a philosophical difference between myself and IGNITE.

When I was on the University of Guelph’s Central Student Association executive as president, we hosted one public meeting of this kind; the Annual General Meeting. We put aside almost two hours of time to field student questions, our nerves were running rampant, because one of our biggest principles was transparency with our finances, and clarity of information about process and activity.

So often, student leadership can lead you to working in a small bubble where other people don’t understand what you’re doing or why, but it is so imperative for student unions to be clear, and patient.

I don’t think IGNITE is out to destroy the culture of Humber and Guelph-Humber. I’m sure they know the good work they’re doing. Working firsthand in student support is a self-made internal justification for the decisions you make.

What I saw during the Special Meeting of the Members was a group of students whose hearts may be in the right place, but they have not embraced the communication aspect that some students demand.

Culture of the school aside, I know IGNITE can do better.

I hope this new structure will allow the directors to be the liaisons that I didn’t see Wednesday. Like I said in a letter to the provincial government last year: “proper policy is not created by consulting only those that agree with you”.

The best we can do as student governments is to never stop asking questions, and always keep listening.  ■

Continue Reading

Trending

© The Avro Post 2017-2019